碳交易及补贴政策对再制造闭环供应链的影响

张海咪,刘渤海,李恩重,张頔,周新远

中国表面工程 ›› 2018, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) : 165-174.

PDF(9287 KB)
PDF(9287 KB)
中国表面工程 ›› 2018, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) : 165-174. DOI: 10.11933/j.issn.1007-9289.20170704001
再制造工程

碳交易及补贴政策对再制造闭环供应链的影响

  • 张海咪,刘渤海,李恩重,张頔,周新远
作者信息 +

Effects of Carbon Trading and Subsidy Policy on Remanufacturing Closed-loop Supply Chain

  • ZHANG Hai-mi, LIU Bo-hai, LI En-zhong, ZHANG Di and ZHOU Xin-yuan
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在有政府参与情况下,针对由制造商和零售商组成的两级闭环供应链,建立了由制造商主导的Stackelberg博弈模型,得出了不同政策对产品的批发价、零售价、产品的回收率、碳排放总量及供应链利润的影响,并用数值算例进行了验证。结果表明:当碳交易价格与政府补贴力度满足一定条件时,在碳交易与补贴结合政策下,会使得零售价降低、回收率提高、需求量增加、供应链总利润大幅提高,同时碳排放量也有较大幅度的下降。因此同时实行碳交易与政府补贴政策可以弥补单独实行两种政策的不足,有效的降低碳排放量、提高供应链的整体利润,从而使得再制造闭环供应链达到较优状态。

Abstract

Considering the involvement of the government, a Stackelberg game model led by a manufacturer was developed, according to two levels of closed-loop supply chain composed of a manufacturer and a retailer. The impacts of different policies on product wholesale, retail, product recovery, carbon emissions and supply chain profit were observed and verified by a numerical example. The results show that, when the price of carbon trading and government subsidies satisfy certain conditions, the combination of carbon trading and subsidy policy can reduce the retail price, increase the recovery rate and the demand, significantly improve the total profit of the supply chain, and significantly decrease the carbon emissions. Therefore, the implementation of carbon trading and government subsidy policy can make up for the deficiencies of separating the two policies, reduce carbon emissions and improve the overall profit of the supply chain, making the remanufacturing closed loop supply chain achieve a better condition.

关键词

再制造;碳交易政策;政府补贴;Stackelberg博弈

Key words

remanufacturing;carbon trading policy;government subsidy;Stackelberg game

引用本文

导出引用
张海咪,刘渤海,李恩重,张頔,周新远. 碳交易及补贴政策对再制造闭环供应链的影响[J]. 中国表面工程, 2018, 31(1): 165-174 https://doi.org/10.11933/j.issn.1007-9289.20170704001
ZHANG Hai-mi, LIU Bo-hai, LI En-zhong, ZHANG Di and ZHOU Xin-yuan. Effects of Carbon Trading and Subsidy Policy on Remanufacturing Closed-loop Supply Chain[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2018, 31(1): 165-174 https://doi.org/10.11933/j.issn.1007-9289.20170704001

参考文献

[1] HOEN K M R, TAN T, FRANSOO J C, et al. Effect of carbon emission regulations on transport mode selection in supply chains[R]. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2010: 1-32.
[2] SONG J, LENGM. Analysis of the single- period problem under carbon emissions policies[M]. New York: Springer, 2012: 297-313.
[3] CHEN X, BENJAAFAR S, ELOMRI A. The carbon-constrained EOQ[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2013, 41(2): 172-179.
[4] TOPTAL A, ÖZLU H, KONUR D. Joint decisions on inventory replenishment and emission reduction investment under different emission regulations[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(1): 243-269.
[5] DRAKE D, KLEINDORFER P R, LUK B, et al. Technology Choice and Capacity Investment Under Emissions Regulation[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2010, 10(93): 1-41.
[6] 常香云, 朱慧赟. 碳排放约束下企业制造/再制造生产决策研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2012, 29(11): 75-78.
CHANG X Y, ZHU H Y. Enterprise manufacturing/remanufacturing production decision research under the constraint of carbon emission[J]. Science&Technology Progress and Policy, 2012, 29(11): 75-78 (in Chinese).
[7] 赵道致, 原白云, 夏良杰, 等. 碳排放约束下考虑制造商竞争的供应链动态博弈[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2014, 19(1): 65-71.
ZHAO D Z, YUAN B Y, XIA L J, et al. Dynamic game study in supply chain with manufacturers' competition under constraint of productions' emission[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2014, 19(1): 65-71 (in Chinese).
[8] 马秋卓, 宋海清, 陈功玉, 等. 碳配额交易体系下企业低碳产品定价及最优碳排放策略[J]. 管理工程学报, 2014, 28(2): 127-136.
MA Q Z, SONG H Q, CHENG G Y, et al. Low carbon product pricing and Optimal carbon emission strategy under cap-and-trade[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 2014, 28(2): 127-136 (in Chinese).
[9] 岳晓娟. 考虑碳排放的零售商定价策略研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2013.
YUE X J. Research on pricing strategy of retailer considering carbon emissions[D]. Chengdu: Southeast Jiao Tong University, 2013 (in Chinese).
[10] HUA G W, CHENG T C E, WANG S Y. Managing carbon footprints in inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 132(2): 178-185.
[11] ZHAO J, HOBBS B F, PANG J S. Long-run equilibrium modeling of emissions allowance allocation systems in electric power markets[J]. Operations Research, 2007, 58(3): 529-548.
[12] DONG C, SHEN B, CHOW P S, et al. Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 240(2): 509-531.
[13] 杨春苗, 戴更新. 零售商回收模式下政府补贴对闭环供应链定价策略的影响[J]. 物流科技, 2016, 39(4): 116-120.
YANG C M, DAI G X. The Effect of government subsidies on the pricing strategies of closed-loop supply chain with retailer-collection channel[J]. Logistics Sci-Tech, 2016, 39(4):116-120 (in Chinese).
[14] 郭成恒, 丁雪峰. 考虑碳排放差异的闭环供应链奖惩机制与减排策略[J]. 统计与决策, 2014(13): 54-57.
GUO C H, DING X F. Reward and punishment mechanism and emission reduction strategy of closed-loop supply chain considering the difference of carbon emission[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2014(13): 54-57 (in Chinese).
[15] 徐春秋, 赵道致, 原白云. 政府补贴政策下产品差别定价与供应链协调机制[J]. 系统工程, 2014, 32(3): 78-86.
XU C Q, ZHAO D Z, YUAN B Y. Product differential pricing and supply chain coordination mechanism under governmental subsidy policy[J]. Systems Engineering, 2014, 32(3): 78-86 (in Chinese).
[16] 刘渤海, 史佩京, 徐滨士, 等. 机电产品的再制造补贴政策[J]. 中国表面工程, 2012, 25(4): 15-20.
LIU B H, SHI P J, XU B S, et al. Subsidy policy of remanufacturing for electromechanical products[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2012, 25(4): 15-20 (in Chinese).
[17] 周占峰. 政府补贴下再制造逆向供应链产品回收定价策略研究[J]. 物流技术, 2012, 31(19): 122-123.
ZHOU Z F. Study on pricing strategy of price recycling in re-manufacturing reverse supply chains with government subsidy[J]. Logistics Technology, 2012, 31(19): 122-123 (in Chinese).
[18] 朱庆华, 窦一杰. 基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6): 86-95.
ZHU Q H, DOU Y J. Green supply chain management game model based on government subsidy analysis[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2011, 14(6): 86-95 (in Chinese).
[19] WEBSTER S, MITRA S. Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the impact of take-back laws[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(6): 1123-1140.
[20] SAVASKAN R C, WASSENHOVE L N V. Reverse channel design: The case of competing retailers[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1): 1-14.
[21] 聂佳佳, 王拓, 赵映雪, 等.碳排放约束下再制造闭环供应链回收策略[J]. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29(3): 249-256.
NIE J J, WANG T, ZHAO Y X, et al. Remanufacturing closed loop supply chain recycling strategy constrained by carbon emissions[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2015, 29(3): 249-256 (in Chinese).

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFF0207905)
PDF(9287 KB)

6

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/